Update on Digital Cameras May 2009

Posted on June 02, 2009

Besides my permanant page on Photography, A few cameras to look at:

Nikon P90 –  around $370. This is a new Coolpix point and shoot with near SLR quality optics.  Its big features are the specifications – super zoom and fast burst speed. Nikon is know for sport shooting so this all makes sense. I have to say, this camera was built for the feature wars though – it matches stats but may not be as wonderful in practice.

They are selling the range of the zoom lens here – its an amazing 24x zoom equal to a 26-624mm lens on an SLR. That won’t get you the widest of angles (I still rely on my 18mm for a panorama or when I’m close to the action in a crowded room) but the distance is amazing. It has ED glass but the optics are fewer and are smaller then a standard Nikkor lens.  The specifications are good f2.8 to f5 max Aperture.  Reports show pretty obvious fish-eye distortion and pincushion at either end of the lens – as with all max zooms this is a problem.  Its going to be a problem with most in this price range. You lose some detail at long range as well.  But you are going to capture the moment and often that is what is most important.

The sensor is a CCD 1/2.33 in with 12.7 million pixels.  Startup time is less then 2 seconds from turn on to shooting. Burst shooting gives you the ability to shoot up to 45 frames in one session at low resolution.  This all comes down to two things. The processor and memory.  If the camera has a fast processor it can move between frames with little to no startup. If it has a good memory buffer then it can store pictures before they go to the memory card; the more memory, the more it can store. Also – get a faster memory card to enhance this feature.  The thing I didn’t see was HD video and RAW format here.

Raw format gives you the chance to mess up.  I’ve often accidentally set my White Balance to flash and then gone outside – all my pictures are blue and ugly.  But with Raw – It stores all of the data for any white balance setting – so I can fix it in Apple Aperture, Adobe Photoshop or the software that comes with the camera.  Without RAW, you are stuck with your mistake. Like shooting with the wrong film in the “olden days.”  The KEY is you have to have the computer software to take advantage of RAW.  iPhoto can now process RAW but it doesn’t give you the control that Aperture or Photoshop do.  Otherwise – Raw only takes a lot of space on the card – shoot most things in Auto White Balance and set the white balance when you time. Having said that – I shoot everything in RAW and use lots of memory cards.  Be realistic with what you think you will do and plan for that.

Video is a convenience thing too.  For most video you want a camcorder.  But for incidental things this is very useful.  There is reportedly noise on the microphone and zoom is not fully functional but it does give you a option not available in my D200 and most DSLR’s. Nothing like the D90 but very useful.  So is the tilting LCD screen for viewing at an angle.

DMC-FZ50 – $1,000. Panasonic appears to have updated the DMC-FZ50 my mom bought.  She loves it.  I reviewed it briefly here.  This is a terrific camera matching Panasonic electronic know-how with a terrific Leica lens. Its got all the manual control you would ever want – similar to my D300.  It now has this Venus III engine that promises quicker response time and less noise.  From the company website: outstanding response time with an industry-leading level of shutter release time lag of as short as 0.009 sec*. minimum and the shutter interval of 0.8 sec*. Together with the fast startup time of approx.0.7 sec.* Based on CIPA standard.

The Panasonic DMC-FZ28 is a more affordable option at $300.  This is a terrific option with much less manual control but still boasing a Leica 18x 27-468mm lens and quality specifications.  It has the Venus IV engine: this slashes the release time lag to around 0.006 second minimum with a Burst Speed of 12MP per second at a lower megapixel range. Maximum of 5 images in Standard mode and 3 images in Fine mode. The Image Sensor is 1/2.33″, 10.7 Mega Total Pixels CCD, Primary Color Filter – the key here is that its bigger then the average point and shoot but half the size of a Nikon DX CCD. So for the same megapixels you get more color depth on a larger CCD or CMOS. This camera’s sensor is about the same as the P90.

With all of the main features of the Nikon P90 It adds HD Movie and HD Output options.  Its got all of the auto focus and image stabilization features you would expect. Focusing options, low noise, etc. JPEG, RAW, etc.  I’ve seen what Mom can do with her FZ50 so I have to think this is a great camera.  With RAW if you do go to digital editing software, you are ready. Just be ready to buy more memory cards.

So the processor and shooting/format options are better then the P90. Draw back is less zoom range on the lens and lower megapixels.  Exactly what Nikon was looking to do in wining the comparison matrix/statistic wars.

Sony A200 - Around $500 with an 18-70MM zoom lens.  This is a Digital SLR born of the Minolta acquisition.  I would put this camera on par with any of the Nikon or Canon entry level Digital SLR’s – so what’s different.  Sony style.  Its got a lot of very user friendly electronics.  Professionals might say too much but I’m looking at a really nice viewfinder with a lot of information in it; a comfortable rocker switch to control it all and traditional Minolta style dials on top for quick access to important settings like aperture and speed, ISO and Image Quality. It doesn’t have the LCD on the top though – I like that quick look.  Personally I would stick with the Nikon line – because I have the lenses.  If you are a Minolta fan – this is a great entry level camera.

The sensor has advanced features for low light an image quality.  10 megapixels  and raw support.   Good depth on the CCD sensor. The computer chip? I cannot tell.   I would say it is as good as the NIkon D80 comparing 10.2 MP – not sure what the startup is; Nikon has a .18 sec start-up with fast response and 3FPS.  The A200 is improved over the A100.  Here is a review by imaging-resource.com

Power-on Time 1.5 sec
Shutter Lag,
Full Autofocus
0.189 sec
Shutter Lag,
Prefocused
0.088 sec
Shot to Shot time 0.51 sec
Continuous Speed 2.82 fps
(8 shots)
Best Macro 3.19×2.13 in
81×54mm
Viewfinder accuracy
(Optical)
95%
Distortion
(Wide Angle)
0.8%
Distortion
(Telephoto)
-0.1%
Battery Life
(CIPA standard)
750 shots

What about lenses? Minolta AF lenses, so if you are moving from a Minolta Film camera you get to use all your old auto focus lenses.  The Alpha-Mount lens is the oldest in the business with lenses available going back 28 years. I

Update to the Nikon DSLR entry level models:

Nikon D40 – Ken Rockwell prefers it, even though its discontinued, to the D40x and D60.  Today, its the Costco camera of choice in a kit with two lenses.  It just goes to show you that the number of megapixels doesn’t matter as much as the quality of each pixel.  6.1 on the D40 is often better then a point-and-shoot 12 MP camera.  it has a 15.6 x 23.7mm CCD sensor. DX format 2.5 FPS How often are you blowing something up to 23×30 anyway. And if you have the lens to get close and frame the shot you don’t need to crop later.

You can go to Costco, spend $599 and get a D40, an 18-55 wide angle to portrait zoom and a 55-200 VR telephoto zoom for sporting events and other things that are far away and fast. Same deal on Adorama – either in the store if you live in NY or online.  I still prefer my 18-200mm VR for one simple reason, One lens – with kids anything can happen so its nice to have one that can do it all. One to carry, one to put on, etc. Otherwise the elements are very similar and you get less distortion at the 55mm focal point. Both will give you pincushion distortion at the top end. So in the end – if you aren’t lazy like me you save money (like $400) and still have two great lenses.   If you really want to get an SLR and you are just starting out then I really think this is it.  Look here at Ken Rockwel’s site. If this becomes your thing – then you can always upgrade later.  Piece by piece as I have. If you aren’t thinking this is your hobby – and you have other things you spend on like gardening, cooking, sports, KIDS – then consider the point and shoot options above.  Good glass is the key though – a convenient small lens point and shoot will be good for candids – to keep in your pocket or purse but without the glass of a real lens you will never have the quality shots.

I don’t want to talk about the D90 and D300. I’m envious of both.  But I’ll just mention two key points here.  The addition of Digital Video, viewfinder option and larger format CMOS sensor.  And just when I got over that they introduced the D5000!

The Nikon D5000 reminds my of my first film camera purchase the Nikon 6006.   12.3MP DX Format CMOS with fast processing.  D Movie Mode 720p HD movie clips with the quality of Nikkor lenses! variangle color LCD monitor. 4 FPS fast shooting.  Looks like they go for around $800 on the internet – with an entry level lens.

The D300 is a nice replacement to my D200 – it keeps the rugged magnesium alloy body and much of the stored custom settings. The body is out there for $1,600.  I have to say the D90 is a really good option though.  Today I’d probably have bought it instead.  The lure of video and still having DSLR quality in a terrific 12MP DX format CMOS is enticing.  Most places sell it with the VR 18-105 lens – Amazon has it for 1,150 for both. I’d prefer if they did a deal like the D40 above and those two lenses – you will always want that extra 100mm for sporting events.  In fact I’ve seen it packages with my 18-200 VR lens for $1,739.

My Gut Feeling:

Entry Point and Shoot:  The Panasonic DMC-FZ28

Entry DSLR: Nikon D40 with the 18-55 and 55-200VR lenses

Cool New DSLR:  D90 with the 18-200VR lens

But remember – I’m partial to Nikon lenses – the Sony is a good option for Minolta lens owners. For example, the new Sony a900 is a freaking work of art – they haven’t damaged the Minolta legacy at all.

Also – I didn’t look at the Canon SX10 IS – its also a very popular camera in the Panasonic DMC-FZ28 category. It appears to be the best of both but it will cost $75-100 more then the Panasonic.

For mor Digital Photography Information

Picnik

Posted on June 02, 2009

Picnik

 

cool application for photo editing. 

Obama on Banking, the Economy and Fixing vs. Controlling

Posted on February 25, 2009

Today’s rant – spurred on by a friend’s insightful rant on an email list I maintain.  Jack made some very poignant comments about the economic state we are in and I wrote the following response – edited for clarity in this forum. 

 
I listened to Obama last night – missed the first 15 minutes but I assume that was pretty much all about creating a frenzie of cheer and support for what he was about to say. We know you inherited all of this, I’m tired of hearing that – can we please move on… okay  - he did eventually.  
 
I don’t think the problems we have today are all about mortgages and greed.    The money on Wall Street was greed driven, and we all know now that they think, "Greed is Good."  While I do believe it started with the Clinton administration pushing home ownership (much like Obama is pushing college) for everyone – even those who shouldn’t in the state they are in.  It didn’t end there – in fact it could have ended sooner – in 2001. As for homeownership – that’s not bad but most of these people should have considered something less then the homes they had – like maybe some people should consider Technology schools, not college)… but I digress   I cannot, however, agree with many of my liberal friend’s panic in saying "I’m willing to let Obama do whatever he thinks is right, including takeover of the banks if need be." That’s as irrational as Bush letting Cheney wipe his ass. 
 
Regarding Clinton starting this vs. Bush causing it… In the dot.com "Boom" Greenspan warned of "irrational exuberance" and we had a bubble burst – Yes, I think Clinton started it – to feed the mass of Baby Boomers who got him elected, but Bush restarted the engine in 2001 to bring us out of the "mental" depression that we were all in after those jealous fuckers bombed us.  They are all politicians who live to be elected and these days – live for the 4-8 years they are in office.  Clinton had the 60’s generation to support him, Bush had us, who wanted what our parents had – so he tried to give it to us. He just picked really bad people to help him do it – people that were politicians that use other people to get what they want – power and enough money to say fuck you to the rest of the world.  I was fooled by them too because I believe in a Republican government….
 
CMOs (Collateralized Mortgage Obligations), the Gaussian copula function, etc. – Yes – I agree – that’s the Wall Street problem.  There is an interesting cover story on Wired magazine this month and much easier to read then the Fortune article a few weeks ago.  My feeling is that this is what took down our investments.  But it’s not the only thing sick in the economy.    I think that it’s the GREED – but not all that people are discussing is Greed driven.
 
Regarding capital gains cuts on home sales, stock sales, and dividends. I’m sorry for but not willing to support people flipping houses, getting caught in the housing boom. Builders developing against the demand is human nature – people want to better themselves and I don’t think greed drove most of us, it was more like PANIC that we wouldn’t have what generations before us had. That we missed the boat, and this might be our last chance to have that home, build wealth, etc.  The people who sold the ARM’s and all-interest mortgages were greedy, feeding on this panic and desire. And the people who were flipping houses also got greedy – some weren’t smart enough to keep money in the bank when doing it. Like sales people – we know there will be lean years with no commission – that’s why we keep cash in the bank. But the people taking the chance to buy a home were just being human.  They just forgot that its buyer beware in this country. (and honestly, I know this – I put a little too much of my "cash backup" in the market so I’m pretty much working till I die). 
 
Or is it buyer beware in this century? – The fact is: our government did fall down on the job.  While I don’t believe in heavy government "control" I do believe in "oversight" and we got lazy there – the Bush administration pulled too far back.  I don’t want the government to run things or own things but I do expect to get my money’s worth on regulators. They let all kinds of devious shit get through from billion dollar ponzi schemes to ass holes like Stan O’Neil of Merrill making really short-sighted and bad decisions. I didn’t like Obama’s tone that all of wall street and banking is corrupt – you can’t lump them all into a bucket of rot – but there are some really bad apples in there and we need to catch them before they infest the rest. 
 
Investment in infrastructure and the military always works.  Bush chose to blow up another country to get rid of our old stuff to buy new stuff.  A good arms race gave us the 50’s – not a bad time to be alive :) – and this along with NASA lead to really cool technology.   I’m a little worried that Obama may not buy new stuff (then we will get blown up and it doesn’t matter does it). If he spends money on bridges and power plants that is okay too.  The one thing I like about France is their embracing nuclear power (well two things – I dig their women too, maybe three – their love of art.. but that’s it).  We should do that. But we don’t need to prop up old industries that nobody wants to work at for the wages they pay. We don’t have a billion Chinese that are willing to work for peanuts to pay for our car companies (its complex – another rant).  Further, I don’t think healthcare reform or investing in education will pump up the economy – that’s all feel good politics.  Don’t mix the two
 
We can’t force innovation just like we couldn’t force a revolution in Iraq – it has to come from the people.  What can we think of to replace the auto industry?
 
We should "fix" healthcare and education things not "nationalize" them. Again, better regulation not controls.   Better ideas not more money after bad ones. What can we do differently then Canada, Europe and China to help people but not create mediocrity and compliance?
 

Insignia 5.0 Digital Camcorder – on Mac OS X – Quicktime

Posted on January 02, 2009

Daniel just got a really cool flip camera from his grandparents and has been enjoying it as he is into video and pictures.  Its an Insignia 5.0MP Digital Camcorder with 2.4"

Swivel LCD Screen.

  Problem is – its video is: MPEG4 (DivX) in AVI wrapper.  This would not play on his eMac and isn’t supported in Mac OS X Quicktime. Enter a few smart developers named David Conrad, Alexander StrangeAugie Fackler, Allan Hsu, and Graham Booker. They developed the Perian – Quicktime Plug-in: Perian – The swiss-army knife of QuickTime® components   This is extremely helpful and has made it possible for Quicktime to not only play DivX format but many others.  So if you get this camera go to their website and download the component.  It installed directly into the System Prefrences control panel and gives you the ability to not only play the video in Quicktime but also use it in iMovie as iMovie uses native quicktime components for its file conversion. 

 

Hamas Ends Cease-Fire – NYTimes.com

Posted on December 30, 2008

Good article in the NYT today that points out - Hamas ended its six-month cease-fire on Dec. 19.

Not Israel.  But the world has a short memory.  The world will forget that Hamas has launched over 10,000 rockets into Israel since 2001. That they are smuggling arms in from Egypt every day preparing for a ground war.  The article points out that Hamas wants the "status as the Palestinians’ principal resistance. Its secular rival, Fatah, sits on the sidelines, marginal to the violence."

News Analysis – For Hamas, Logic Led to Cease-Fire’s End – NYTimes.com

"The key issue is whether Palestinians will blame Israel for raining fire down upon them, as Hamas hopes. Or blame Hamas for provoking it, as Fatah, Israel and its Western allies hope."

"Right now Palestinians are blaming Israel, loudly."

About the Mac OS X 10.5.6 Update

Posted on December 29, 2008

About the Mac OS X 10.5.6 Update

Lots of fixes in this one.  It appears to have fixes for both the Airport issue with 802.11N networks and the Address Book sync issues on Mobile Me.  Also the mail not quitting and junk mail staying problem.  All issues my Mom has had with her new iMac. 

If you are having problems with the update – such as a start-up loop (never stop restarting) or issues with Bluetooth then check out these suggestions at MacFixIt http://www.macfixit.com/article.php?story=2008121622093232

 

Run in Mountain View, CA – 3 miles

Posted on December 15, 2008

Raining, cool 42 degrees, 8:30AM PST - not a bad day to run.  Started out and saw a double rainbow – it was between rain’s and the sun was rising opposite the rainbow – beautiful.  So I decided I simply had to run.  Pace was smooth at first – running with my iPod so I was fighting the beat with my own rhythm.  I expected to feel it around the mile marker – felt it at 3/4 of a mile – so I slowed a bit from 8 to 9 minute miles.  Felt stronger at a mile so took it back up to 7.5-8.0 min miles and then back down. 

Mile 1: 8:57   max 8.1mph  AHR: 153BPM

Mile 2:  9:25   max 7.5mph AHR: 174BPM

Mile 3:  9:31  max  7.9mph AHR 173BPM

Total – 3.14 miles  30 minutes  9.37/mile avg pace  166 avg heart rate

Garmin Training Center Screen Shot

Koran from Muhammad or God; Torah from Babylonian Jews or God?

Posted on December 07, 2008

Read an interesting article in today’s New York Times Magazine (December 7, 2008; page 24 Who Wrote the Koran?) about a theological reformer challenges those who claim to speak for Islam. By Mohammad Ayatollahi Tabarr.  Abdulkarim Sorush is Iran’s leading public intellectual, he is a scholar of Islamic theology and was Ayatollah Khomeini’s man for bringing Islam back to Iran. But he is a smart guy and he really studied what he was doing – and consequently asked people to think, not just follow.  Much like the true Rabbi’s and Scholars of ancient Hebrew texts and the Torah.  As a Reform Jew I do believe that the Torah reflects what God wants us to live our lives – but through ancient stories passed down from generation to generation.  There are some that believe the Torah was directly given to us by God and others who believe that the stories were first written down in Ancient Babylon to unite and help the Jews from becoming assimilated into the Babylonian culture. Its one thing to come out of a cave and say "I have found the word of God – see we weren’t kidding" and another to say  "you have to do this because I say its the right way to live your life." Same for the Koran according to Sorush.  As written in the article:

"The recent controversey began about eight months ago, after Soroush spoke with a Dutch reporter about on of Islam’s most sensitve issues: the divine origin of the Koran. Muslims have long believed that their holy book was transmitted word for word by God through the Prophet Muhammad. In the interview, however, Sorush made explicit his alternative belief that the Koran was a"prophetic experience." He told me that the Prophet "was at the same time the receiver and the producer of the Koran or, if you will, the subject and the object of the revelation."

 Its pretty a conversation I have all the time – you can argue against divine creation of all that we are "Adam and Eve" or you can say Darwin was right.  Or you can believe what I believe in that Darwin was right but the hand of God was involved every step of the way.  So that as a Reform Jew – I do think these very smart Rabbi’s or Priests or whomever, did write down the Torah very carefully and said "this is the word of God" to get people emotionally involved.  The less intelligent were hooked as they needed guidance and a way to follow without thought, the intelligent who had morals and a grasp on social reality said – this is a good way to teach.

So I’ve just insulted my friends who are Orthodox, no way – they are the ones who study and question the most – it is the way of our people, and the way of Islamic scholars for thousands of years. It is only fear and control that make for tyrannical rule. The kind of rule they needed at the time of Mohammad to unite the Arabs, the kind they needed in ancient Israel to unite the Jews and the kind they needed in ancient Rome to re-unite the Roman Empire to become the Holy Roman Empire.  I’m equally insulting all religious believers who cling to a patriarchal hierarchy of God-King-Man (or God-Pope-Bishop-King-Man; or God-Ayatollah-President-Man; or God-Priest-King-Man).  We don’t need a king in a democracy so we don’t need religion in government.  Its what this country was built on – not a Godless nation, a nation under God – but with liberty and justice for all.  With the hand of God guiding us along – but not ruling over us. I believe God planned all along to let us find our own way – he just gave us the tools (Torah, Bible, Koran or whatever) to make sure we stay on the right path. 

Auto Makers Force Bailout Issue – WSJ.com

Posted on November 10, 2008

Auto Makers Force Bailout Issue – WSJ.com

Aside from questions about the wisdom of government intervention or putting taxpayer money at risk, bailing out Detroit could put Washington in the position of subsidizing job losses. The car makers have at least 10 assembly plants more than they need to meet demand, according to Oliver Wyman Consulting. That translates to roughly 30,000 factory jobs plus significant numbers of engineers and other salaried personnel. GM estimates it needs to slash its salaried-employee costs in North America by 30%. Car makers would likely use federal money to subsidize these job cuts, buying out older workers to make room for new, lower paid replacements. United Auto Workers President Ron Gettelfinger has said more union concessions are out of the question, union lobbyist Alan Reuther said in an interview with Dow Jones Newswires on Friday. "We feel we’ve already stepped up" by giving ground last year on future workers’ pay and benefits and retiree health care, Mr. Reuther said. The UAW wants assurances a bailout would help secure its members’ retirement and health-care benefits.  READ MORE on WSJ.com

Pelosi, Reid Press for TARP Aid for Auto Industry – WSJ.com

Posted on November 09, 2008

We can survive without an antiquated automobile industry but we can’t survive without a banking industry. This is one of the areas that McCain spoke of early that I agreed with – before he was trying to get elected. These people need to find new/different jobs in a different industry. Even the Democrats have said that – promoting clean/green industry. From one side they want to destroy Detroit and the gas guzzlers they make but then they want to save the companies so the people who work there keep obsolete jobs. Don’t want to mess with your political base now. Politics, not "logitics."

Pelosi, Reid Press for TARP Aid for Auto Industry – WSJ.com

"It was not set up for anything else," said Bush spokesman Tony Fratto, noting the only assistance authorized by Congress for the auto industry is a $25 billion loan package meant to help the industry retool to meet higher fuel economy standards….

Democratic congressional leaders are considering convening a lame-duck session of Congress later this month to deal with economic concerns. The session could be used to enact a short-term stimulus package or to approve assistance for auto makers. But the Democratic leadership is not inclined to act, absent a signal from the White House that Mr. Bush would be willing to sign a bill.

 China Announces Major Stimulus Plan – WSJ.com

On the other side of the world China is worrying about our reduction in spending and buying.  So while we have the same problem for our inferior auto production companies – they have it for all the factories and cascading down, the infrastructure development companies that support all the growth. But instead of supporting dying industry, they will put it directly into the economy and the infrastructure:


China’s plan appears to be comparable in size. In a statement announcing the plan, China’s State Council said it would deliver 120 billion yuan ($18 billion) of new spending in the last quarter of this year alone. The State Council — effectively China’s cabinet — estimated that would drive an additional increase of 400 billion yuan in local and private-sector investment throughout the economy.

China’s government is also making plans for new spending in areas such as low-cost housing, road and rail infrastructure, agricultural subsidies, health care and social welfare over the next two years…

…The new measures include an expected revamping of China’s value-added tax system to allow all companies operating in China to deduct spending on capital equipment. The government estimated the new system, which is already in place in some provinces, would save companies a total of 120 billion yuan when fully rolled out. The government has recently been phasing out tax breaks specifically for foreign companies to invest in China and didn’t mention any such measures as part of the stimulus…

…The government is presenting the program as an opportunity to do many things that would be worth doing anyway. Those include helping companies upgrade to higher-tech equipment, improving irrigation in rural areas, raising pensions and social-security payments, and improving water and waste treatment in crowded cities.