Auto Makers Force Bailout Issue – WSJ.com

Posted on November 10, 2008

Auto Makers Force Bailout Issue – WSJ.com

Aside from questions about the wisdom of government intervention or putting taxpayer money at risk, bailing out Detroit could put Washington in the position of subsidizing job losses. The car makers have at least 10 assembly plants more than they need to meet demand, according to Oliver Wyman Consulting. That translates to roughly 30,000 factory jobs plus significant numbers of engineers and other salaried personnel. GM estimates it needs to slash its salaried-employee costs in North America by 30%. Car makers would likely use federal money to subsidize these job cuts, buying out older workers to make room for new, lower paid replacements. United Auto Workers President Ron Gettelfinger has said more union concessions are out of the question, union lobbyist Alan Reuther said in an interview with Dow Jones Newswires on Friday. "We feel we’ve already stepped up" by giving ground last year on future workers’ pay and benefits and retiree health care, Mr. Reuther said. The UAW wants assurances a bailout would help secure its members’ retirement and health-care benefits.  READ MORE on WSJ.com

Pelosi, Reid Press for TARP Aid for Auto Industry – WSJ.com

Posted on November 09, 2008

We can survive without an antiquated automobile industry but we can’t survive without a banking industry. This is one of the areas that McCain spoke of early that I agreed with – before he was trying to get elected. These people need to find new/different jobs in a different industry. Even the Democrats have said that – promoting clean/green industry. From one side they want to destroy Detroit and the gas guzzlers they make but then they want to save the companies so the people who work there keep obsolete jobs. Don’t want to mess with your political base now. Politics, not "logitics."

Pelosi, Reid Press for TARP Aid for Auto Industry – WSJ.com

"It was not set up for anything else," said Bush spokesman Tony Fratto, noting the only assistance authorized by Congress for the auto industry is a $25 billion loan package meant to help the industry retool to meet higher fuel economy standards….

Democratic congressional leaders are considering convening a lame-duck session of Congress later this month to deal with economic concerns. The session could be used to enact a short-term stimulus package or to approve assistance for auto makers. But the Democratic leadership is not inclined to act, absent a signal from the White House that Mr. Bush would be willing to sign a bill.

 China Announces Major Stimulus Plan – WSJ.com

On the other side of the world China is worrying about our reduction in spending and buying.  So while we have the same problem for our inferior auto production companies – they have it for all the factories and cascading down, the infrastructure development companies that support all the growth. But instead of supporting dying industry, they will put it directly into the economy and the infrastructure:


China’s plan appears to be comparable in size. In a statement announcing the plan, China’s State Council said it would deliver 120 billion yuan ($18 billion) of new spending in the last quarter of this year alone. The State Council — effectively China’s cabinet — estimated that would drive an additional increase of 400 billion yuan in local and private-sector investment throughout the economy.

China’s government is also making plans for new spending in areas such as low-cost housing, road and rail infrastructure, agricultural subsidies, health care and social welfare over the next two years…

…The new measures include an expected revamping of China’s value-added tax system to allow all companies operating in China to deduct spending on capital equipment. The government estimated the new system, which is already in place in some provinces, would save companies a total of 120 billion yuan when fully rolled out. The government has recently been phasing out tax breaks specifically for foreign companies to invest in China and didn’t mention any such measures as part of the stimulus…

…The government is presenting the program as an opportunity to do many things that would be worth doing anyway. Those include helping companies upgrade to higher-tech equipment, improving irrigation in rural areas, raising pensions and social-security payments, and improving water and waste treatment in crowded cities.

 

 

 

FireWire Developer Note: FireWire Product-Specific Details

Posted on November 08, 2008

FireWire Developer Note: FireWire Product-Specific Details Mac Pro Computers (January 2008) The Mac Pro computers with Quad-Core Intel Xeon 5400 Series microprocessors were introduced in January 2008. The Mac Pro provides two FireWire 800 IEEE 1394b ports and two FireWire 400 IEEE 1394a ports. The four FireWire ports are on the same FireWire bus and share a single 12V DC-regulated power supply that can provide 18 W per port, for up to 28 W total. If a device is added that exceeds the power limit, the port will be disabled but the other ports will continue to function. Unplug the device, and the disabled port will recover in a short amount of time. FireWire port power is provided when the computer is on, in sleep, or off.  The Open Host Controller Interface (OHCI) connects to the South Bridge IC via a PCI Express 1-lane 2.5 GHz bus. The front and rear FireWire PHYs interface via the OHCI. The Mac Pro provides front and rear port repeating when the computer is powered on or asleep. Front and rear repeating is also available when the computer is off, unless the computer was shut down from Mac OS X with no FireWire devices connected.

 

So I wonder, can you add a PCI card for Firewire 800/400 to just power the front ports so that the power limitation can be increased?